Obama’s broken promises


SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Earlier this month, President Obama reneged on two important issues.

First came the announcement that legal trials at Guantánamo Bay would recommence. Then, just a few days later, Obama stated that the widely condemned treatment of Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of leaking classified files to WikiLeaks, was “appropriate and meeting our basic standards.”

On his rise to power in 2008, Obama spoke out against the treatment of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay and vowed to close the prison. Within hours of becoming president, he put a halt to the (now resumed) tribunals at the camp — during which the U.S. military acts as both judge and jury. He also pledged to protect government whistleblowers and spoke passionately about the need for a “common humanity” and a “new era of peace” in his inauguration speech.

Obama’s transformation since then has been remarkable. Through the course of his two-year tenure so far, five suspected government whistleblowers have been charged on suspicion of leaking classified information — more than under the respective terms of Reagan, Nixon, and both George Bushes combined.

Aside from declaring what Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg has described as a “war on whistleblowers,” Obama has also escalated military action in Afghanistan and sanctioned clandestine bombings in Pakistan and Yemen. And while Guantánamo remains open and its trials resume, his government continues to allow “extraordinary rendition,” a practice — again condemned by Obama prior to his election — that involves the CIA abduction of terror suspects, who are transferred to prisons in countries with questionable human-rights records.

Part of Obama’s massive appeal in 2008 was that he originally appeared to be a man of liberal principles. In his book Dreams from My Father, he portrayed his younger self as a humble intellectual who entered politics from community activism. It was natural to want to believe he was different; after eight years of war and draconian civil-liberties crackdowns under the presidency of George W. Bush, Obama’s talk of “hope” and “change” was welcome. But we were gullible and naïve to fall blindly for his rhetoric.

In London recently, Hillary Rodham Clinton’s senior adviser on innovation, Alec Ross, spoke at the London School of Economics. His lecture was, in many ways, a reflection of the Obama presidency: It was stylishly delivered and punctuated with idealism, though chillingly devoid of substance.

As Ross spoke about the “free Internet” and implementing a “change agenda,” the spirit of Obama lingered in the room. When probed by one audience member on the role of his government in Guantánamo and extraordinary rendition, Ross looked momentarily bewildered. “I cannot disembowel my country’s history,” he said. “I don’t always feel great about our past, but I feel good about our future.”

Such unwillingness to tackle the ugly realities of American political life has been a defining feature of Obama’s two years in office. Supporters of Obama point to his criticism of China’s human-rights record and refusal to oppose gay marriage, both of which are undeniably commendable. But the president needs to do much more. There was a sense three years ago that Obama represented a whole new dawn for America, perhaps even the world; today, his apparent reluctance to stick to previously advocated principles has left many feeling empty and betrayed.

Giving his second State of the Union address in January, Obama spoke of how America “supports the democratic aspirations of all people.” No number of grand speeches, however, can alter the paradox of his country’s present position as both advocate and adversary of democracy. The imprisonment and punitive treatment of whistleblowers, trial under military jury at Guantánamo, and the sanctioning of extraordinary rendition — these are not policies in line with any notion of democracy.

The problem is that Obama has become just another large cog in the same machine he set out to dismantle. When he speaks, it is difficult to hear anything other than broken promises and backtracking. He will undoubtedly go down in history as one of the great orators, but it is actions, not words, that will rightly define his legacy. Regardless of how many times Obama promises a “change agenda,” the uncomfortable truth is that so far he has failed dramatically to deliver.

Ryan Gallagher is a freelance journalist based in London. A version of this commentary originally appeared at openDemocracy.net.

> Share your thoughts! Click here to write a Letter to the Editor.

comments powered by Disqus

Privacy Policy (8/15/07) | Terms of Use (4/28/08) | Content Submission Agreement (8/23/07) | Copyright Compliance Policy (8/25/07) | RSS Terms of Use

Copyright © The Daily Iowan, All Rights Reserved.